<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Programming languages on RAVR Lab</title>
    <link>http://ravrlab.ru/en/cs/progr_and_sdes/langs/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Programming languages on RAVR Lab</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://ravrlab.ru/en/cs/progr_and_sdes/langs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why Python is de-facto standard in Data Science</title>
      <link>http://ravrlab.ru/en/cs/progr_and_sdes/langs/python/python_ds/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ravrlab.ru/en/cs/progr_and_sdes/langs/python/python_ds/</guid>
      <description>When performing large amount of calculations, Python is in general ~100 times slower than C++. Still, it is de-facto standard in Data Science. How?&#xA;Reasons:&#xA;Quick development — Python is a high-level language, that is easy to learn and to use Many Python libs (like numpy) are wrappers for C++ code, thus making performance issues less severe Enormously large and developed ecosystem In a data processing cycle (find and prepare, develop, IO, calculate, analize, etc.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
